Welcome to the Association of Adult Literacy Professional Developers!
Today is

Publications/Presentations

Listed below are publications and presentations by or for AALPD members.

(in progress)

publications image

Matrix of Methods for Professional Development (Word)
Organizes approaches into 4 primary areas - Face to Face Across Programs, Online or Hybrid Professional Development, Program-based, and Supported Individual Learning. This matrix is a good starting point to invite other professional developers to add to the matrix or to comment on professional development strategies.

National Initiatives Relevant to Professional Development in Adult Literacy, April 2007
AALPD provides information about these major staff development efforts across the United States:

  • AdultEd Online

  • Thinkfinity

  • Standards-In-Action: Turning Adult Education Standards Into Curriculum and Instruction

  • Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

  • Effective Practices in Reading in Adult Education and Family Literacy

  • An Evaluation of the Impact of Explicit Literacy Instruction on Adult ESL Learners

presentations image


Role of Professional Development in Evidence-based Practice in Adult Education.”
Slide presentation from COABE, April 2003

If you have an initiative or project that you would like to list here, please send the information to the Chair


additional resources

PD Registry | AALPD Resources Wiki | NIFL Program Management Special Collection | NAEPDC State Resource Library


Evaluating Professional Development Resources Selection and Development Criteria, a publication by PRO-NET 2000. This publication provides the field with information on what comprises "quality" professional development resources. It provides a set of criteria and indicators to (1) help program and professional develoment staff select and evaluate professional development materials and resources, and (2) help professional developers and researchers prepare and develop quality resources. The criteria are organized into four categories: Appropriateness of General Content, Appropriatness of Design an Delivery, Quality of Research Base, and Ease of Adoption/Adaptation.